Las transformaciones de la identidad nacional y la cuestión de la territorialidad en perspectiva comparada: los casos de Quebec y el País Vasco
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The centrality of the question of territoriality for the discussion about selfdetermination in nationalistic movements makes it specially appropriate to adopt a comparative perspective. This will allow us to show the similarities and the particularities among different cases studies. This paper compares Basque and «Quebecois» nationalism by focusing on the role that territoriality plays in national identity. Firstly, it is argued that ethnic and civic concepts are unsuitable for classifying these nationalisms. This paper continues by showing the relevance and potentialities of comparing the Basque and «Quebecois» cases. In particular we compare the representation of the national territory in each case, as well as its role for the national identity. Other questions are compared, e.g., the linkage between territory and others diacritic features, or the linkage between territorial integrity and sovereignty, Finally, the paper points out the «political role» that nationalism warrants to the territory in order to fulfil the political agenda of sovereignty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it