MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1634078453 · doi:10.1109/pac.1995.505867

Properties of a transverse damping system, calculated by a simple matrix formalism

2002· article· en· W1634078453 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings Particle Accelerator Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBetatronPhysicsDamperAmplitudeControl theory (sociology)Beam (structure)Transverse planeMagnetic dampingClassical mechanicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a synchrotron, proton beams with injection steering errors perform coherent betatron oscillations, possibly of large amplitude. The oscillations may be damped by using a system of a beam position monitor and a variable, fast kicker combined in a feedback loop to form a 'transverse damper'. The system of ring, beam and damper can be modeled by iteration of a matrix mapping once per turn. This paper reports the calculation of damping rates, and coherent tune shifts by analytic solution of the recursions. Two cases are treated: (i) kick proportional to beam displacement; and (ii) 'bang-bang' damping in which, above a certain threshold, the kick depends only on the sign (+/-) of the displacement. We demonstrate (under certain conditions) that the 'bang-bang' scheme provides a linear damping of the amplitude and no tune shift, and (for the same peak power) is faster than the conventional proportional damper which produces an exponential damping with time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it