MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1634080165 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1996.548220

An adaptive neurocontroller for speed control of a synchronous generator

2002· article· en· W1634080165 on OpenAlexaff
S.Z. Ao, K.E. Bollinger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkPermanent magnet synchronous generatorController (irrigation)Process (computing)Feed forwardBackpropagationGenerator (circuit theory)Feedforward neural networkInverse dynamicsStability (learning theory)Adaptive controlControl engineeringInverse systemPower (physics)InverseControl (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural networks have shown great promise in many areas of engineering. In this paper, we present a newly designed neural control system that consists of three neural networks cascaded together, one representing the inverse model of the speed-governing and turbine system, another identifying the dynamics of the synchronous generator, and a third being part of the controller. The inverse model is achieved with a multilayer feedforward neural network trained in batch mode through back-propagation learning. Once the network is trained, its weights and biases will be fixed. The dynamics of the synchronous generator is identified on-line while the generator is operating. The weights of the neurocontroller are determined by sweeping back the control error. Usually this updating process has a lower frequency than the identification process to ensure the stability of the entire control system. The neurocontroller was applied to a multi-machine power system and some simulated results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207