MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W163414714

Determination of the Deformation State of a Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Subjected to Orthogonal Cutting Using Experimental and Numerical Methods

2012· article· en· W163414714 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Aquidul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDeformation (meteorology)AlloyMaterials scienceTitanium alloyStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthogonal cutting of Ti-6Al-4V alloy was studied. Surface roughness, chip thickness and shear band frequency increased with the feed rate and cutting speed. Serrated chips were formed due to shear band. Strain and flow stress distributions in the material ahead of the tool tip were estimated from shear angle measurements and microhardness measurements respectively. The stress-strain data obtained in this way was used in numerical models. Two numerical models were developed by using two-dimensional Lagrangian element formulation and Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics formulations employing the Johnson-Cook constitutive relationship that utilised the experimental data generated from the machined material with the damage criteria. The Lagrangian element formulation predicted the strain and temperature generated in the material ahead of the tool tip as 1.65 and 1222 K respectively, which were in agreement with the experimental strain (1.65) and temperature (1217 K). The predicted results using Lagrangian element formulation correlated well with the experimental findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicMaterial Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207