Les debuts de l’éducation sanitaire au Québec: 1880–1901
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les découvertes bactériologiques du dernier tiers du XIXe siècle ont donné lieu à un changement radical de la conception des causes des maladies infectieuses et des moyens de lutte contre celles-ci. Au Québec, entre 1880 et 1900, des médecins par leurs écrits et une association par son engagement social en faveur des femmes vont prendre le leadership de ce qui est considéré comme le premier mouvement d’éducation sanitaire de la population. Le contexte de la naissance de ce mouvement est d’abord présenté. Le contenu du Journal d’hygiène populaire, principal instrument de communication de ces médecins vulgarisateurs, est ensuite analysé en dégagent ses principaux thèmes et en les resituant dans le contexte des nouvelles connaissances médicales des deux dernières décennies du XIXe siècle. La contribution parallèle d’une association féminine au renforcement de ce mouvement est enfin dégagée, dans le cadre du Québec de ces mêmes années.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".