MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1635829042 · doi:10.3917/rsi.109.0057

Recherche fondamentale en science infirmière

2012· article· fr· W1635829042 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Nadot

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche en soins infirmiers · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À défaut de recherches fondamentales sérieuses en histoire sur la standardisation de sa propre discipline, la profession infirmière continue d’alimenter les clichés, renforce le sens commun et repose sur des symboles et des croyances issues du passé ainsi que sur ce qui caractérise de manière générale les carrières féminines dans notre société. Le déficit de reconnaissance scientifique, que vit la profession infirmière n’est dès lors pas trop étonnant. À l’heure de la mondialisation des connaissances, qui restent à ce jour, l’unique source d’avantages concurrentiels durables, l’historien de la discipline infirmière se pose la question sur le statut international qu’a sa discipline au sein des mondes savants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.133
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1330.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.697
GPT teacher head0.627
Teacher spread0.070 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche en soins infirmiersSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207