MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1636129700 · doi:10.4000/bifea.3179

Los límites de la política imperial: el oidor Juan de Barrio Sepúlveda y la frontera esmeraldeña a inicios del siglo XVII

2008· article· es· W1636129700 on OpenAlexaff
Raúl Hernández Asensio

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza la política desarrollada por el oidor Juan del Barrio Sepúlveda en la región de Esmeraldas, situada al noroeste de Quito, a comienzos del siglo XVII. A través de este caso se analizan las posibilidades y limitaciones del poder imperial español en las áreas marginales de la América colonial. La política de Sepúlveda descansa sobre un conjunto de alianzas inestables con agentes de poder locales, indígenas y mulatos. Estas alianzas están cimentadas a partir del reparto de bienes y la entrega de regalos por parte de la Real Audiencia. Sin embargo, su operatividad sobre el terreno es limitada. Los cambios de coyuntura muestran la fragilidad de los pactos establecidos y ponen en cuestión su continuidad. Cada una de las partes involucradas maneja agendas propias, que a mediano plazo resultan incompatibles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l’Institut français d’études andinesSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207