MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1637025518 · doi:10.24033/asens.2148

Foliated structure of the Kuranishi space and isomorphisms of deformation families of compact complex manifolds

2011· article· fr· W1637025518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Scientifiques de l École Normale Supérieure · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesConseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-ComtéUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMathematicsHolomorphic functionCounterexamplePure mathematicsPointwiseDifferentiable functionContractible spaceSpace (punctuation)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Complex manifoldCompact spaceMathematical analysisDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L MEERSSEMAN A. -Consider the following uniformization problem. Take two holomorphic (parametrized by some analytic set defined on a neighborhood of 0 in C p , for some p > 0) or differentiable (parametrized by an open neighborhood of 0 in R p , for some p > 0) deformation families of compact complex manifolds. Assume they are pointwise isomorphic, that is for each point t of the parameter space, the fiber over t of the first family is biholomorphic to the fiber over t of the second family. Then, under which conditions are the two families locally isomorphic at 0? In this article, we give a sufficient condition in the case of holomorphic families. We show then that, surprisingly, this condition is not sufficient in the case of differentiable families. We also describe different types of counterexamples and give some elements of classification of the counterexamples. These results rely on a geometric study of the Kuranishi space of a compact complex manifold. R. -Considrons le problme d'uniformisation suivant. Prenons deux familles de dformation holomorphes (paramtres par un ensemble analytique dfini dans un voisinage de 0 dans C p pour p > 0) ou diffrentiables (paramtres par un voisinage de 0 dans R p pour p > 0) de varits compactes complexes. Supposons-les ponctuellement isomorphes, c'est--dire que, pour tout point t de l'espace des paramtres, la fibre en t de la premire famille est biholomorphe la fibre en t de la deuxime famille. Sous quelle(s) condition(s) les deux familles sont-elles localement isomorphes en 0? Dans cet article, nous donnons une condition suffisante dans le cas de familles holomorphes. Nous montrons ensuite que, de faon surprenante, la condition n'est pas suffisante dans le cas des familles diffrentiables. Nous dcrivons galement plusieurs types de contre-exemples et donnons quelques lments de classifications de ces contre-exemples. Ces rsultats reposent sur une tude gomtrique de l'espace de Kuranishi d'une varit compacte complexe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it