Characterization of Mouse Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unit describes functional assays for the quantification of mouse hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells. The competitive repopulating unit (CRU) assay detects transplantable mouse hematopoietic stem cells with the capacity to regenerate all of the blood cell lineages for extended time periods in vivo. The long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assay, founded on the bone marrow long-term culture system, measures primitive hematopoietic progenitors based on their capacity to produce myeloid progeny for at least four weeks. Colony-forming cell (CFC) assays, performed in semisolid medium cultures to assess mouse pre-B, megakaryocyte, erythroid, granulocyte-monocyte, and multipotential hematopoietic progenitors are also described. These assays are powerful tools for evaluating human stem cell (HSC) and progenitor content in various hematopoietic tissues, during development as well as in the adult animal, and in cell populations manipulated ex vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".