MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1637592567 · doi:10.21831/amp.v2i1.2406

KEMAMPUAN GURU DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN DI SMP NEGERI KOORDINATOR WILAYAH SLEMAN TENGAH

2014· article· id· W1637592567 on OpenAlexaff
Endang Purwanti, Anik Ghufron

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan penelitian adalah mendeskripsikan: (1) kemampuan guru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di SMP Negeri Koordinator Wilayah Sleman Tengah dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran (2) faktor penghambat dan pendukung guru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di SMP Negeri Koordinator Wilayah Sleman Tengah dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran secara profesional. Metode penelitian mengguna-kan jenis penelitian kualitatif. Subjek penelitian guru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 5, Kepala Sekolah 3, guru mata pelajaran lain 9, siswa 6 serta pengawas 1. Teknik pengumpulan data: pengamatan parti-sipasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan model kualitatif-interaktif. Hasil penelitian: (1) kemampuan guru Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di SMP Negeri Koor-dinator Wilayah Sleman Tengah dalam pembelajaran kurang. Penyusunan RPP belum serius. Pelaksa-naan pembelajaran didasarkan kebiasaan guru mengajar. Guru belum berperan sebagai pendidik, inovator, dan teladan. Penilaian berbentuk ulangan harian, ujian mid semester dan ujian semesteran, belum mengembangkan instrumen penilaian. (2) Hambatan internal terbatasnya wawasan materi PKn, lemahnya motivasi mempelajari bahan ajar, komitmen belum kuat, terbatasnya pengalaman mengikuti forum ilmiah. Hambatan eksternal terbatasnya media pembelajaran di sekolah. Media pembelajaran kurang menarik ditampilkan di kelas. Keterbatan di sekolah adalah sumber bahan ajar.Kata kunci; kemampuan guru, mata pelajaran PKN, pembelajaran

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen PendidikanSame topicEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207