InAs/InP quantum-dot pillar microcavities using SiO2/Ta2O5 Bragg reflectors with emission around 1.55 μm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present optical characterization measurements from three-dimensional pillar microcavities comprising an InP spacer layer sandwiched between two SiO2/Ta2O5 Bragg reflectors. InAs quantum dots placed at the center of the InP spacer are used as broadband emitters. Emission into the lowest-order mode is observed at an energy of 820 meV in the wide-pillar limit, with shifts of approximately 30 meV in the ground state and more than 80 meV in higher-order modes for pillars of 2 μm diameter. Excellent agreement is found between the experimentally observed cavity mode energies as a function of pillar diameter and the predictions of guided-mode theory. Cavity quality factors in excess of 2200 are obtained for large diameter pillars, with a decrease to approximately 500 for pillars of 2 μm diameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".