MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1638066286 · doi:10.1116/1.1691081

Direct UV patterning of waveguide devices in As2Se3 thin films

2004· article· en· W1638066286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotodarkeningChalcogenideMaterials scienceFabricationRefractive indexAmorphous solidThin filmOptoelectronicsPhotolithographyChalcogenide glassOpticsEtching (microfabrication)WaveguideNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photodarkening of thermally evaporated amorphous As2Se3 chalcogenide thin films was generated by a UV mercury light source in a standard mask aligner. The refractive index modification of the chalcogenide glass was determined by applying Swanepoel’s method. Index changes of +0.04 were obtained for 500 s exposure. Using these photoinduced index changes, waveguides with losses of approximately 1 dB/cm at 980 nm were fabricated. Another set of waveguides was fabricated by UV exposure and subsequent selective etching to form rib structures. Those waveguides exhibited loss of approximately 2 dB/cm at 980 nm. Silver photodoping of As2Se3 was also performed on a mask aligner with index increases on the order of 0.3 obtained. Due to the rapid and large photomodification obtainable with standard photolithographic equipment, these processes are promising for integrated optic device fabrication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it