Expression of SNAP‐25 in human pituitary neoplasms.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SNAP‐25, a synaptosome associated exocytosis protein of 25 kDa plays an important role in the secretory activity of several endocrine cells. In the present study, we investigated 15 PRL, 10 GH, 5 ACTH, 5 TSH, 15 FSH/LH/ alpha subunit producing, and 5 null cell adenomas. Surgically removed, formalin‐fixed and paraffin embedded human pituitary tumors were used. Sections were immunostained by the streptavidin‐biotin‐peroxidase complex method. The results showed that 10 PRL producing adenomas were strongly immunoreactive for SNAP‐25. The immunopositive material was located mainly on the plasmalemma. The nuclei were immunonegative, the cytoplasm was mildly immunopositive in several cells. Treatment of patients with dopamine agonists before surgery decreased markedly SNAP‐25 immunopositivity in 5/10 cases. In GH producing adenomas SNAP‐25 was seen in 5 cases. Immunopositivity was mild‐ moderate, membrane bound and cytoplasmic. Somatostatin analogs caused no marked reduction in immunopositivity (5 cases). Other adenoma types were practically immunonegative. Among human pituitary adenomas only PRL producing tumors release their secretory granules via exocytosis as was demonstrated by electron microscopy. This observation is concordant with our results. In dopamine agonist treated patients, decreased SNAP‐25 expression in PRL producing adenoma cells is consistent with reduction of blood PRL levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".