MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1638470167 · doi:10.1002/ggge.20142

Paleointensity results from the late‐Archaean Modipe Gabbro of Botswana

2013· article· en· W1638470167 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian R. Muxworthy, Michael Evans, S. J. Scourfield, James G. King

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGabbroArcheanGeophysicsSeismologyPaleontologyIgneous rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rock‐magnetic and Thellier‐Thellier‐Coe paleointensity results are reported for a new collection of samples from the 2.78 Ga Modipe Gabbro of Botswana. The magnetic properties are very favorable, leading to an unusually high success rate and a well‐constrained result of 36–40 µT (95% confidence interval). We discuss the long‐standing problem of allowing for the enormous differences between the natural and laboratory cooling rates, and apply a temperature‐dependent correction derived from first‐order reversal curve (FORC) data. Whereas pure single‐domain (SD) corrections often lead to quite large decreases in paleointensity estimates (sometimes exceeding 50%), we find a modest increase of about 10%. The Earth's Magnetic Dipole moment in the late Archaean is thereby estimated to have been ∼6×10 22 Am 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207