MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1638910307 · doi:10.3968/5939

Calligraphy and Culture Cultivation

2014· article· en· W1638910307 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Changchun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalligraphyEnthusiasmPanacea (medicine)Modernization theoryAestheticsPerspective (graphical)Chinese cultureSociologyHistoryLiteraturePolitical scienceArtVisual artsPsychologyLawArt historySocial psychologyChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though big accomplishments, after a long swell of enthusiasm, have been made for Chinese calligraphy, various potential risks still exist in it. The author carries a serious sense of crisis about the circle of Chinese calligraphy today, especially about the absence of traditional culture in the process of Chinese calligraphy modernization. Based on the perspective of culture cultivation, the author starts to believe that the methods of “be moral”, “be informative” and “be a professional of calligraphy” proposed by master Xu Wuwen is a panacea to cure the diseases tormenting calligraphy circle today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207