MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Propriedades ópticas não lineares e microestruturação em vidros boratos com laser de femtossegundos

2012· dissertation· pt· W1639068469 on OpenAlexaff
Juliana Mara Pinto de Almeida

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLaserFemtosecondOpticsSapphireOptical parametric amplifierRefractive indexOptoelectronicsAttenuation coefficientOptical amplifierPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrashort laser pulses have been used to study and develop nonlinear optical processes in materials, as well as for their processing, aiming at several technological applications. In this work, both areas (study of optical nonlinearities and materials processing) were exploited for different glass materials. Initially, we have studied the third order nonlinear optical spectrum of lead oxifluoroborate glasses (50BO 1,5 -(50-x)PbF 2 -xPbO) as a function of the composition. The optical nonlinearities were determined from the visible to the near infrared employing the Zscan technique, using a Ti:sapphire laser system (775 nm, 150 fs, 1 kHZ) and an optical parametric amplifier (470 a 2000 nm) as excitation sources. The results revealed that the formation of non-bridging oxygens favors the nonlinear optical properties of the material; the glass with x = 50 presents the higher third order nonlinearities, exhibiting a nonlinear index of refraction of about 4,7 x 10 -19 m 2 /W at the range of 470 -1550 nm, and a two-photon absorption coefficient of approximately 1 cm/GW at the resonant enhancement region. Figure of merit analysis and optical limiting measurements suggest that these glasses have potential for applications in optical limiting and all-optical switching. Regarding materials processing, we have used femtosecond laser micromachining to produce microstructures in lead borate and borosilicate glasses. We were able to produce lines with controlled widths, from 3 -35 m, on the surface of the glasses by changing the focus, speed and energy of the laser beam. Moreover, using femtosecond laser pulses we obtained copper nanoparticles on the surface as well as in the bulk of a borosilicate glass. We have observed that there is an optimal combination between scanning speed and annealing temperature to promote the formation of nanoparticles at the regions irradiated by the laser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207