Magnetocaloric effect in Gd5Si2Ge2∕Gd composite materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spark plasma sintering technique has been applied to synthesize composite Gdx(Gd5Si2Ge2)1−x (x=0.3, 0.5, and 0.7) with layer structure using high-purity gadolinium (Gd) metal and Gd5Si2Ge2 alloys. The magnetocaloric effect of the composites was studied by directly measuring adiabatic temperature change (ΔTad) with a magnetic-field change of 1.5T using a homemade magnetocaloric effect measuring apparatus. With increasing x from 0.3 to 0.7, ΔTad peak temperature shifted from 286to293K and the peak values of ΔTad slowly increased from 1.6to2.0K at a magnetic-field change of 1.5T. Meanwhile, the ΔTad peak of the composite broadened as Gd content was increased. For x=0.7, the composite showed a ΔTad ranging from 1.1to2.0K at a magnetic-field change of 1.5T in a temperature range of 260–300K, which adapted to work as a room-temperature refrigerant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".