Re-writing colonized subjects: disciplinary gestures in Charles Kingsley´s at last : a christmas in the west Indies (1871)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los libros de viajes de la segunda mitad del siglo XIX (el periodo victoriano) escritos sobre el mundo tropicalizado se distinguen de los que se escribieron en la Gran Bretaña durante las primeras décadas del siglo, en particular por las nuevas exigencias para la representación del control británico en el periodo postemancipación. Este artículo descubre las representaciones visuales y textuales de los negros y los culíes en el siglo XIX en Trinidad, en el libro de viajes del historiador natural británico Charles Kingsley, resaltando el poder discursivo de estas representaciones para la reestabilización del dominio británico en la colonia. La reescritura de los sujetos coloniales por Kingsley no puede separarse de la redefinición y redistribución de las ideas sobre raza y gobierno en el Imperio Británico, y específicamente en el contexto de la falta de mano de obra en el periodo después de la emancipación, el surgimiento del sujeto negro y las ansiedades coloniales sobre el temperamento negro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".