A shrinking population offers opportunities for a sustainable Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Japan’s Edo period may represent the good society more than modern day society; it was sustainable and self reliant. Japan and other Asian countries now have a decreasing population. World population has increased from 2.5 billion in 1950 to over 7 billion today and there are some who think the earth’s carrying capacity has been exceeded. Japan’s land area is slightly smaller than the state of California and its population density is 836 per square mile, far higher than Canada at 9, Sweden at 57, France at 289 and even Haiti at 781 . This high density is reflected in the need for order, oshiyas to push people into trains and the focus on miniaturization (bonsai, sushi, calculators, compact discs, cameras and compact cars). The population during the Edo period was 30 million and Japan was self-sufficient during that time; very little was imported . In the 1990s Japan only provided one-third of its needs and imported 27 million tons of grain . Currently Japan imports 78% of its energy, 60% of its food and 82% of its construction timber . The Edo period included innovation such the mechanized dolls that became the robots of today. Therefore a large population is not needed for innovation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".