MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Inuit Claims Hinder NASA Mars Project

2001· article· en· W1642105030 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wayne Kondro

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramImpact craterGovernment (linguistics)Martian surfaceGeographyMartianAstrobiologyArchaeologyPhysical geographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CANADAOTTAWA, CANADA-- Since 1997, researchers have been testing the idea that the apparent similarity between the Haughton crater, a 20-kilometer-wide chunk of barren land in what is now Nunavut Territory in northwestern Canada, and the martian surface might be scientifically important. But 2 years ago the local Inuit people denied the researchers access to 70% of the crater, citing a 1993 land claim agreement with the federal government. Researchers are hoping to be able to come to an agreement with local officials at a meeting in November.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0250.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience→Same topicPlanetary Science and Exploration→French-language works237,207→