MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W164237141

Using Selectional Restrictions to Query an OWL Ontology

2006· article· en· W164237141 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Kosseim, Reda Siblini, Christopher J. O. Baker, Sabine Bergler

Bibliographic record

VenueFormal Ontology in Information Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOntologyMean reciprocal rankInformation retrievalUpper ontologyRank (graph theory)Natural language processingSuggested Upper Merged OntologyOntology-based data integrationOntology Inference LayerQuestion answeringNatural languageOWL-SOntology alignmentArtificial intelligenceSemantic WebSemantic Web StackMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the linguistic module of an Ontology Natural Language Interaction System that is based on semantic restrictions. The system, called ONLI, takes as input questions in unrestricted natural language, translates them into nRQL, an extension to the RACER ontology query language, then generates answers as returned by the RACER ontology reasoning server. Translation into nRQL is done through a syntactic analysis (with Minipar), followed by the use of semantic restrictions imposed by the roles stored in the ontology to map terms in the question to concepts and roles in the ontology. The system was evaluated on the FungalWeb ontology using the mean reciprocal rank (MRR) measure used in question-answering. With a test set of 36 questions, the systems achieved an MRR of 0.72.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFormal Ontology in Information SystemsSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207