MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1642458343 · doi:10.1109/pes.2004.1373107

Communications for a large distribution automation project in Thailand

2004· article· en· W1642458343 on OpenAlexaff
Roy Hoffman, P. Aouad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSCADATelecommunicationsEngineeringProcess automation systemAutomationCommunications systemProject commissioningWork (physics)Systems engineeringElectrical engineeringPublishing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work describes the communications system and other main features of a large distribution automation project being commissioned by the provincial electricity authority of Thailand. The project includes the construction of five new area distribution dispatching centers and one new system management center buildings and the installation and commissioning of new SCADA/DMS systems in these centers. A total of 150 substations and over 2000 individual feeder devices are monitored and controlled by the six SCADA/DMS systems. The communication system from the control centers to most of the substations uses previously installed digital microwave links and/or a time division multiple access radio system. However, the project included the design and installation of a new extensive multiple address radio system (MARS) that extends digital communications from the microwave facilities to the feeder devices or implements new links with leased lines coupled to a network of MARS between the control centers and the feeders devices. The project was started in late 2000 and will be fully operational in 2004.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207