MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1642476711 · doi:10.1063/1.373834

Photoluminescence and photostimulated luminescence of Tb3+ and Eu3+ in zeolite-Y

2000· article· en· W1642476711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescencePhotostimulated luminescencePhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceIonPhotoluminescence excitationChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhotochemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tb 3+ and Eu3+ were codoped in zeolite-Y. Their photoluminescence and photostimulated luminescence were investigated. Due to the dissipation of excitation energy by OH vibrations, the luminescence from the hydrated zeolite containing Tb3+ and Eu3+ prepared at room temperature is very weak. However, the luminescence is enhanced greatly when the sample was treated at 800 °C. Strong photostimulated luminescence of both Tb3+ and Eu3+ was detected in the sample prepared at 800 °C. The photostimulated luminescence of Tb3+ is due to the recombination of electrons with Tb4+ ions, while the photostimulated luminescence of Eu3+ is caused by energy transfer from Tb3+ to Eu3+. The existence of Tb4+ and Eu2+ ions is due to charge transfer from Eu3+ to Tb3+. The occurrence of photostimulated luminescence and discrete emission lines in blue (434 nm), green (543 nm), and red (611 nm) colors indicate that this material has potential applications in white light-emitting devices and erasable optical storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it