MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W164289239 · doi:10.7202/010086ar

La mesure de l’espérance de vie sans démence : étude préliminaire de faisabilité

2004· article· fr· W164289239 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Karen Ritchie

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les études sur l'espérance de vie en santé ont presque toutes privilégié la prévalence des maladies et des incapacités physiques chroniques, sans envisager la possibilité de calculer l'espérance de vie sans démence; or, les taux de prevalence de la démence sont fortement liés à l'âge. Cet article comporte des propositions sur l'utilisation de telles mesures et s'intéresse aux progrès réalisés dans le domaine des méthodes d'identification permettant des comparaisons transnationales. Nous avons également tenté de construire une courbe théorique pour la survie sans démence basée sur des données de prevalence issues d'une méta-analyse concernant plusieurs pays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.084
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.084
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207