MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lagrangian and Eulerian RE

2012· book-chapter· en· W164311683 on OpenAlexaff
Florin Diacu

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantis Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEulerian pathLagrangianMechanicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The case \( N = 3 \) presents particular interest in Euclidean space because the equilateral triangle is a RE for any values of the masses, a property discovered by Joseph Louis Lagrange in 1772, We will further show that this is not the case in \( {\text{S}}^{ 2} \) and \( {\text{H}}^{ 2} \), where the positive and negative elliptic Lagrangian RE exist only if the masses are equal. This conclusion provides a first step towards understanding with the help of these equations whether space is Euclidean for distances of the order of 10 AU because Lagrangian orbits of unequal masses show up in our solar system, as for example the approximate equilateral triangle formed by the Sun, Jupiter, and the Trojan/Greek asteroids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantis Press eBooksSame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207