MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1643120035 · doi:10.1037/12344-000

Short-term group therapies for complicated grief: Two research-based models.

2010· book· en· W1643120035 on OpenAlexafffund
William E. Piper, John S. Ogrodniczuk, Anthony S. Joyce, Rene Weideman

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Psychological Association eBooks · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHealth and Welfare CanadaCanadian Psychiatric Research Foundation
KeywordsTerm (time)GriefPsychologyGroup (periodic table)PsychotherapistMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effectiveness of individual and group therapies -- Prevalence of complicated grief -- Risk factors for complicated grief -- Effects of patient characteristics on therapeutic outcome -- Effects of process variables on therapeutic outcome -- Effects of group composition on therapeutic outcome -- Assessment and preparation -- Common components of the two models -- Time-limited, short-term, interpretive group therapy -- Time-limited, short-term, supportive group therapy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Psychological Association eBooksSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207