MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1643381747

Real Time Physical Analysis of Consolidation Process for Low Pressure Gas Dynamic Spray

2009· article· en· W1643381747 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Lubrick

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoatingTransducerConsolidation (business)Materials sciencePorosityAcousticsProcess (computing)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceComposite materialEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gas dynamic spray process is studied via acoustic methods with the main focus being on developing an online system to monitor the process as it occurs. Elastic modulus measurements of the coatings are determined from the sound velocity and porosity. The resulting data is than compared against a minimum contact area model that is developed to describe the bonds that are formed between particles. The results show a good fit to the theoretical considerations of the model. Different transducer designs are considered leading to the use of a multi-element flat transducer for the online monitoring. Online measurements show that the build-up of the coating can be directly seen as well as accurate profiles of the coating created. Finally the online results are shown to be able to accurately predict thickness measurements of the coating acoustically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207