MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1643561535 · doi:10.1109/twc.2015.2437872

Optimal Access Class Barring for Stationary Machine Type Communication Devices With Timing Advance Information

2015· article· en· W1643561535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRandom accessComputer scienceCorrectnessWirelessScheme (mathematics)Computer networkComputational complexity theoryDistributed computingAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current wireless cellular networks can be used to provide machine-to-machine (M2M) communication services. However, the Long Term Evolution (LTE) networks, which are designed for human users, may not be able to handle a large number of bursty random access requests from machine-type communication (MTC) devices. In this paper, we propose a scheme that uses both access class barring (ACB) and timing advance information to prevent random access overload in M2M systems. We formulate an optimization problem to determine the optimal ACB parameter, which maximizes the expected number of MTC devices successfully served in each random access slot. Hence, the number of random access slots required to serve all MTC devices can be minimized. To reduce the computational complexity and improve the practicability of the proposed scheme, we propose a closed-form approximate solution to the optimization problem and present an algorithm to estimate the number of active MTC devices requiring access in each random access slot. The correctness of the analytical model and the accuracy of the estimation algorithm are validated via simulations. Results show that both numerical and approximate solutions provide the same performance. Our proposed scheme can reduce nearly half of the random access slots required to serve all MTC devices compared to the existing schemes, which use timing advance information only, ACB only, or cooperative ACB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it