MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1643668861 · doi:10.7202/029627ar

Évolution démographique et demande énergétique : l’exemple de l’électricité au Québec

2009· article· fr· W1643668861 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Luc Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecCanadian Hydrographic Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la plupart des entreprises privées et publiques, le ménage ou le logement est considéré comme l’unité de base pour le suivi et la planification de la consommation de biens et de services. L’exemple de la planification des besoins en électricité à Hydro-Québec sera illustré dans cette note de recherche. Pour desservir sa clientèle résidentielle dans le futur, la société d’État doit projeter l’évolution de la population, des ménages et des logements en tenant compte du type de construction et de leur emplacement géographique. Chaque section de cette étude présente les principales étapes de la prévision de la demande d’énergie à partir des perspectives démographiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207