MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1644309096 · doi:10.1109/atm.1997.624674

Packing scheme for layered coding MPEG-2 video transmission over ATM based networks

2002· article· en· W1644309096 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedro Cuenca, Luis Orozco–Barbosa, L. Wang, A. Garrido, Francisco J. Quiles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkBitstreamAsynchronous Transfer ModeMultiplexingTransmission (telecommunications)Coding (social sciences)Quality of serviceReal-time computingScheme (mathematics)Video qualityMPEG-2AlgorithmDecoding methodsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the transmission process of a video signal over ATM networks, cells are inevitably exposed to delays, errors and losses due to the statistical multiplexing used in these networks. These phenomena effect the quality of the video signal and without adequate measures to control the propagation of the impairments the quality of the service may fall below acceptable levels. In the first part of this paper, we present an adaptive data partitioning (ADP) scheme. This scheme splits a video stream into a high priority and low priory substreams. In the second part of the paper, we propose a novel hierarchical packing scheme for the transmission of the two video substreams over ATM. The proposed packing scheme overcomes the problem that when no provisions are taking to properly pack a hierarchical-encoded video stream, the loss of a high priority ATM cell will result in the complete loss of the group of cells. Results for different video sequences and different bitstream split levels are given, showing the efficiency of our schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207