MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1644364981 · doi:10.1080/01418610208235741

‘Disordered’ Ba(Mg<sub>1/3</sub>Ta<sub>2/3</sub>)O<sub>3</sub>and its ordering transition

2002· article· en· W1644364981 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chang Lei, S. Amelinckx, Gustaaf Van Tendeloo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical properties · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsAnnealing (glass)StoichiometryCrystallographyMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyReciprocal latticeMicrostructureCondensed matter physicsDiffractionElectron microscopeElectron diffractionChemistryNanotechnologyPhysicsMetallurgyOpticsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microstructure of the as-received disordered Ba(Mg1/3Ta2/3)O3 (BMT) and BMT after ordering heat treatment was studied by electron diffraction and high-resolution electron microscopy (HREM). ‘Disordered’ BMT consists of short-range-ordered nanodomains; diffuse streaking along all (111) directions is present in the reciprocal space. HREM images show that the BaO3 framework is unfaulted; the defects occur on the B cation (Mg and Ta) sublattice and consist of ‘chemical faults’. Such faults change the local composition, causing a local excess of either Mg or Ta. The overall 1:2 stoichiometry can be conserved by the occurrence of both types of fault. Heat treatments will remove these faults and yield 1:2 ordered nuclei; further annealing will make these ordered nuclei grow larger, inducing long-range-ordered orientation variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical magazine. A/Philosophical magazine. A. Physics of condensed matter. Structure, defects and mechanical propertiesSame topicMicrowave Dielectric Ceramics SynthesisFrench-language works237,207