Pour une définition de l’action dans la perspective actionnelle en France
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues, document de référence sur la conception de l’enseignement des langues en Europe, se situe dans une perspective actionnelle. Cependant, il ne promeut aucune théorie sous-jacente. Cet article, à partir de la métasynthèse qualitative de la littérature sur la question, montre que pourtant le Cadre et la communauté scientifique en faveur de la perspective actionnelle valorisent les théories socioconstructivistes lorsqu’ils caractérisent la notion d’action.
 
 The Common European Framework of Reference for Language, a reference document on the conception of the instruction of European languages, is set in an action-oriented approach. Yet, it does not promote any underlying theory. Using a qualitative metasynthesis of literature to address the issue, this article shows, however, that the Framework and the scientific community in favour of the action-oriented approach value these socioconstructivist theories when they characterise the concept of action.
 
 Article reçu le 2011-10-09; accepté le 2012-08-01
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it