MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1645982246 · doi:10.1063/1.3387911

Enhanced piezoelectricity and high temperature poling effect in (1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–xPbTiO3 ceramics via an ethylene glycol route

2010· article· en· W1645982246 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamel N. Tailor, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolingPhase boundaryPiezoelectricityCeramicEthylene glycolPiezoelectric coefficientSinteringDielectricPhase (matter)Chemical engineeringCalcinationMineralogyComposite materialAnalytical Chemistry (journal)FerroelectricityOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A solution chemical method utilizing ethylene glycol as solvent has been developed to prepare the ceramics of (1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–xPbTiO3[(1−x)PMN–xPT] from a precursor powder that can be pressed and fired in one step to produce high quality ceramics with excellent piezoelectric properties. The ceramics reach a relative density of up to 97% of the theoretical value after direct calcinations. This high density is achieved without the need of additional sintering after calcination which is usually required in conventional solid state syntheses to produce ceramics. The ceramics exhibit a unipolar piezoelectric coefficient d33 of 848 pC/N, which is one of the highest values for any unmodified/untextured binary systems reported to date. Since the piezoelectric properties depend on composition and electric field, the effect of poling conditions was investigated. A critical temperature limit has been found, above which poling can dramatically impair the piezoelectric properties due to a field-induced increase in the monoclinic phase component around the morphotropic phase boundary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207