MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1647533071 · doi:10.1029/2008gc002182

Boron and chlorine contents of upper oceanic crust: Basement samples from IODP Hole 1256D

2008· article· en· W1647533071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanic crustGeologySeafloor spreadingBasaltCrustHydrothermal circulationBoronGeochemistrySeawaterBasementMineralogySubductionGeophysicsOceanographySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boron, Cl, Ti, K, Sm, and Gd concentrations of oceanic crust samples were determined by prompt gamma neutron activation analysis. The samples include 63 basalts and 5 gabbros obtained at various depths (369–1503 m below seafloor) from Hole 1256D during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 206 and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 309 and 312. The results show stepwise downhole variations, B content and B/K decrease, and Cl content and Cl/K increase with increasing depth. High B content (>1.5 ppm) in shallower rocks (extrusive lavas) is probably achieved by low‐temperature seawater alteration, and high Cl contents (up to 1400 ppm) in the deeper rocks (plutonic section) would show result of high‐temperature hydrothermal alteration. Average B and Cl values for the upper oceanic crust in Hole 1256D are 1.5 ppm and 334 ppm, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it