MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1647533071 · doi:10.1029/2008gc002182

Boron and chlorine contents of upper oceanic crust: Basement samples from IODP Hole 1256D

2008· article· en· W1647533071 on OpenAlexaff
Takashi Sano, Masaya Miyoshi, S. Ingle, Neil R. Banerjee, Mitsunori Ishimoto, T. Fukuoka

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanic crustGeologySeafloor spreadingBasaltCrustHydrothermal circulationBoronGeochemistrySeawaterBasementMineralogySubductionGeophysicsOceanographySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boron, Cl, Ti, K, Sm, and Gd concentrations of oceanic crust samples were determined by prompt gamma neutron activation analysis. The samples include 63 basalts and 5 gabbros obtained at various depths (369–1503 m below seafloor) from Hole 1256D during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 206 and Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 309 and 312. The results show stepwise downhole variations, B content and B/K decrease, and Cl content and Cl/K increase with increasing depth. High B content (>1.5 ppm) in shallower rocks (extrusive lavas) is probably achieved by low‐temperature seawater alteration, and high Cl contents (up to 1400 ppm) in the deeper rocks (plutonic section) would show result of high‐temperature hydrothermal alteration. Average B and Cl values for the upper oceanic crust in Hole 1256D are 1.5 ppm and 334 ppm, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207