MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1648423287 · doi:10.1109/aps.2003.1219313

Extraction of RLGC parameters with a 2D finite-difference frequency-domain method for wave guiding structures

2004· article· en· W1648423287 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Deng, Zhizhang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationFrequency domainLattice (music)Transmission lineEquivalent circuitFinite difference methodSurface waveAcousticsMathematical analysisComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A frequency-domain 2D full wave method is presented in this paper for extracting frequency-dependent equivalent circuit parameters R, L, G and C of any mode in a guided wave structure. The parameters extracted by this method can be used in circuit simulators to investigate frequency-domain responses of the transmission lines which are uniform along the wave propagation direction. Because a compact 2D lattice is used instead of the conventional Yee's 3D lattice, and calculations are performed only on the cross-section of a structure, computation expenditures are reduced significantly. In addition, it can account for any arbitrary geometry and any guided-wave mode. Numerical examples are provided to validate the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→