MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1648897910 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.357

M4CVD: Mobile Machine Learning Model for Monitoring Cardiovascular Disease

2015· article· en· W1648897910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWearable computerSupport vector machineMachine learningArtificial intelligenceVital signsRaw dataWearable technologyReal-time computingHuman–computer interactionEmbedded systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present M4CVD: Mobile Machine Learning Model for Monitoring Cardiovascular Disease, a system designed specifically for mobile devices that facilitates monitoring of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The system uses wearable sensors to collect observable trends of vital signs contextualized with data from clinical databases. Instead of transferring the raw data directly to the health care professionals, the system performs analysis on the local device by feeding the hybrid of collected data to a support vector machine (SVM) to monitor features extracted from clinical databases and wearable sensors to classify a patient as “continued risk” or “no longer at risk” for CVD. As a work in progress we evaluate a proof-of-concept M4CVD using a synthetic clinical database of 200 patients. The results of our experiment show the system was successful in classifying a patient's CVD risk with an accuracy of 90.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it