MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1649071847 · doi:10.1063/1.2838479

Dielectric properties and relaxor behavior of a new (1−x)BaTiO3–xBiAlO3 solid solution

2008· article· en· W1649071847 on OpenAlexafffund
Huichun Yu, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDielectricMaterials scienceFerroelectricityTetragonal crystal systemCondensed matter physicsSolid solutionCurie temperaturePolarHysteresisCurie–Weiss lawCrystal structureFerromagnetismCrystallographyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new lead-free perovskite solid solution of (1−x)BaTiO3–xBiAlO3 (x=0.02, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15) that exhibits ferroelectric properties and relaxor behavior has been synthesized by solid state reactions. X-ray diffraction patterns show a transformation from the tetragonal symmetry into a rhombohedral symmetry as a result of the substitutions of Bi3+ on the A site and Al3+ on the B site in the crystal lattice of BaTiO3. The temperature and frequency dependences of the dielectric constant indicate a crossover from a normal ferroelectric to relaxor behavior. The degree of deviation from the Curie–Weiss law is found to increase with the increasing amount of BiAlO3. The high-temperature slope of the dielectric peak for x=0.05, 0.1 and, 0.15 can be well described by a Lorenz-type relation. Typical relaxor behavior is observed for x=0.15 with the temperature of the dielectric peak Tm=360K at 1kHz, while ferroelectric hysteresis loop is displayed at room temperature. This suggests that the long-range polar order from the end member BaTiO3 persists and coexists with polar nanoregions induced by the chemical disorder following the coupled substitutions in the solid solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207