Recherches sur la pensée musicale de Glenn Gould : l’empreinte de l’héritage schoenbergien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette these se propose de demontrer que, au-dela de son image d’interprete de la musique de Jean-Sebastien Bach, le pianiste Glenn Gould a developpe, a travers ses nombreux ecrits, une veritable pensee musicologique, qui surprend par sa coherence et dont les racines sont a chercher en realite du cote d’Arnold Schoenberg, le compositeur qui l’aura le plus influence. Nous nous attachons donc ici a l’observation et a l’analyse de cette pensee a travers les ecrits du musicien canadien, l’objectif etant la mise en evidence du rapport existant avec la pensee de Schoenberg. L’analyse comparative menee ici repose sur les principes que Gould avait lui-meme places au fondement de sa pensee : le raisonnement justifiable, l’esprit de re-creation, le concept inductif et la musicologie scientifique. Pour ce faire, nous avons adopte un cheminement logique passant successivement par les domaines suivants : methode, creation musicale, interpretation, critique, pedagogie et enregistrement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".