MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1649253606 · doi:10.1029/2006wr005275

Metaelliptical copulas and their use in frequency analysis of multivariate hydrological data

2007· article· en· W1649253606 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Christian Genest, Anne‐Catherine Favre, Jean‐Guy Beliveau

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education, Recreation and SportsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCopula (linguistics)Multivariate statisticsGoodness of fitStatisticsEconometricsFlood mythMultivariate analysisHydrology (agriculture)MathematicsComputer scienceGeologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaelliptical copulas are introduced as a flexible tool for modeling multivariate data in hydrology. The properties of this broad class of dependence functions are reviewed, along with associated rank‐based procedures for copula parameter estimation and goodness‐of‐fit testing. A new graphical diagnostic tool is also proposed for selecting an appropriate metaelliptical copula. Peak, volume, and duration of the annual spring flood for the Romaine River (Québec, Canada) are used for illustration purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations271
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207