Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’opposition que l’on retrouve tout au long de l’histoire des sciences sociales entre une théorie de type empiriste ou réaliste et une théorie de type constructiviste ou idéaliste, correspond, en politique, l’opposition entre un objectivisme scientiste et un subjectivisme ou spontanéisme. Cette double opposition se voit de façon claire à propos des classes sociales et elle est très présente au sein même de la tradition marxiste. La théorie des classes pose en effet un problème central qui renvoie à la théorie de la perception du monde social et qui est celui du rapport entre la conscience savante et la conscience commune, c’est-à-dire, du rapport entre les classements que le sociologue propose et ceux que les agents ont dans la tête. La sociologie peut d’autant moins prétendre à une quelconque objectivité ou vérité que ces classements sont eux-mêmes un enjeu de la lutte entre les agents sociaux, qu’il y a une lutte des classements qui est une dimension de la lutte des classes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".