Linear and Nonlinear Optics of Organic Materials XI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
vii Conference Committee NONLINEAR OPTICAL MOLECULES AND POLYMERS 7774 03 Analysis of the unusual wavelength dependence of the first hyperpolarizability of porphyrin derivatives [7774-02] K. De Mey, K. Clays, Katholieke Univ. Leuven (Belgium); M. J. Therien, D. N. Beratan, Duke Univ. (United States); I. Asselberghs, Katholieke Univ. Leuven (Belgium) 7774 04 Predicting the nonlinear optical response in the resonant region from the linear characterization: a self-consistent theory for the first-, second-, and third-order (non)linear optical response [7774-03] J. Perez-Moreno, Katholieke Univ. Leuven (B elgium); K. Clays, Katholieke Univ. Leuven (Belgium) and Washington State Univ. (United States); M. G. Kuzyk, Washington State Univ. (United States) 7774 08 Electronic responses of donor acceptor substituted twisted biphenyls [7774-07] A. Boeglin, A. Barsella, Institut de Physique et Chimie des Materiaux de Strasbourg, CNRS (France); H. Chaumeil, E. Ay, Lab. de Chimie Organique et Bioorganique, CNRS, Ecole Nationale Superieure de Chimie de Mulhouse (France); J. Rotzler, M. Mayor, Univ. of Basel (Switzerland); A. Fort, Institut de Physique et Chimie des Materiaux de Strasbourg, CNRS (France) CHARACTERIZATION 7774 0B Conjugated polymers: a hyper-Rayleigh scattering study [7774-10] I. Asselberghs, E. Franz, K. Clays, G. Koec kelberghs, T. Verbiest, Katholieke Univ. Leuven (Belgium) 7774 0C Study of two-photon absorption in organic materials by thermal lensing and nonlinear transmission measurements [7774-11] H. Derbal-Habak, Univ. d'Angers (France) and Institut Materiaux Microelectronique Nanosciences de Provence, CNRS, Univ. Aix-Marseille (France); A. Taouri, Univ. d'Angers (France) and Hassan II Univ. (Morocco); M. Sy lla, P. Hudhomme, Univ. d'Angers (France); R. Mountasser, Hassan II Univ. (Morocco); J. M. Nunzi, Queen's Univ. (Canada) 7774 0D Mach-Zehnder interferometry method for decoupling electro-optic and piezoelectric tensor components in poled polymer films [7774-12] C. Greenlee, A. Guilmo, A. Opadeyi, R. Himmelhuber, R. A. Norwood, M. Fallahi, College of Optical Sciences, The Univ. of Arizona (United States); J. Luo, S. Huang, X.-H. Zhou, A. K.-Y. Jen, Univ. of Wash (United States); N. Peyghambarian, College of Optical Sciences, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".