MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1651017120 · doi:10.4000/ahrf.1198

Isabelle BACKOUCHE, La trace du fleuve. La Seine et Paris (1750–1850), Paris, Éditions de l'EHESS, 2000, 431 p., 280 F.

2001· article· fr· W1651017120 on OpenAlexaff
Raymonde Monnier

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales historiques de la Révolution française · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtTRACE (psycholinguistics)Philosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Seine a été, avant les grands travaux haussmanniens, un véritable champ d'expériences pour la recomposition du paysage et de l'urbanisme parisien depuis les dernières décennies du XVIIIe siècle. C'est cette histoire de la mutation décisive de la relation du fleuve à la ville et à ses habitants qu'étudie cette thèse dense et convaincante. Depuis que les voies sur berges servent à l'écoulement de la circulation automobile, on a peine à imaginer la complexité de l'activité humaine permanente...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales historiques de la Révolution françaiseSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207