Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les fêtes populaires offrent un champ d’observation très propice à l’étude des processus de construction de la valeur patrimoniale, tant du point de vue institutionnel que du point de vue communautaire. Elles semblent, en effet, jouer un rôle de plus en plus important dans les économies locales qui misent sur leur patrimoine immatériel. Ces fêtes sont aussi l’objet d’une tension entre un désir d’appropriation, qui conforte le sentiment d’appartenance et d’identification à la localité, et un désir d’attraction, voire de séduction, pour attirer les visiteurs et rentabiliser le développement local. Le carnaval de Québec, une fête populaire hivernale et urbaine, est un terrain privilégié pour examiner cette tension entre l’événement touristique et la fête locale. En définitive, touristification et patrimonialisation sont les deux actes d’une même pièce qui se joue dans certaines fêtes populaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".