The role of migration in the development of the Canadian and Brazilian Jewish communities.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apesar das diferenças em tamanho, características e desenvolvimento histórico, certas questões são comuns no crescimento das comunidades judias do Canadá e do Brasil em suas respectivas sociedades multiculturais e multiétnicas. Essas duas comunidades judias preocupam-se com as altas taxas de exogamia e com a assimilação. Há tentativas de atacar esses problemas por meio do fortalecimento da educação judaica e das atividades comunitárias. O envelhecimento das comunidades e as baixas taxas de fertilidade têm provocado declínio natural do crescimento. A emigração tem pequena contribuição nos decréscimos populacionais. Grande número de imigrantes da Rússia, do Norte e Sul da África, Israel e Argentina tem aumentado as comunidades judias do Canadá, e existem programas atuantes que estimulam a migração interdiaspórica para o Canadá. A comunidade judia do Brasil, entretanto, não tem conseguido atrair imigrantes judeus para incrementar seu índice populacional. A discussão se estende para o papel da migração no desenvolvimento das comunidades judias no Brasil e no Canadá. Abstract: Despite the differences in their sizes, characteristics, and historical development, certain common issues confront the growth of the Jewish communities of Canada and Brazil in their respective multicultural and multiracial societies. These two Jewish communities are concerned about the high rates of out-marriage and assimilation. They attempt to combat these issues by strengthening Jewish education and communal activities. Ageing communities and low fertility rates have led to declining natural growth rates. Out-migrations contributed slightly to population decreases. Large numbers of immigrants from Russia, North Africa, South Africa, Israel, and Argentina has strengthened Canada’s Jewish communities and there are active programs fostering inter-diasporic migration to Canada. Brazil’s Jewish community, however, is unable to attract Jewish immigrants to bolster its ranks. The discussion expands upon the role migration plays in the development of the Jewish communities in Brazil and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".