The Effectiveness of Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate in the Treatment of Wrist Ganglia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ganglia are the most common benign soft tissue tumours of the hand. Although benign, a significant number of patients with wrist ganglia consult with their general practitioners, and ultimately the hand surgeon, complaining of pain. A great number of patients are concerned about the cosmetic appearance, and an equally significant number genuinely believe that the ganglion is a cancer. There are several management options resulting in varying degrees of success. These include observation only, surgical excision, aspiration only, aspiration with injection of methylprednisolone, and aspiration with injection of methylprednisolone and hyaluronidase. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of sodium tetradecyl sulfate as a sclerosing agent after aspiration of wrist ganglia. METHODS: Initial data were collected prospectively during a period of 48 months. Following this, patients were sent a postal survey at least two years after they had received treatment to access the levels of recurrence and persistent complications. RESULTS: In the short term, 90% of the patients achieved complete resolution after one episode of aspiration and injection. However, there was only a 65% cure rate after two to five years. Complications were few and not significant. CONCLUSION: Sodium tetradecyl sulfate is an effective sclerosing agent after aspiration of wrist ganglia with an excellent short-term efficacy and a long-term cure rate comparable to that of surgical excision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".