Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper addresses the factors that hinder women’s participation in the private sector in Jordan, through assessing the basic factors that hinder women’s empowerment and the role of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Jordan in order to achieve the following objectives: explore the meaning of 'Women empowerment’ concept and how to integrate her in development and its relation to Gender concept; explore the factors empower the Jordanian women; and suggest more factors that have better influence on women empowerment and participation in labor force. The paper reached some fi ndings for empowering women in Jordan such as: Political authority as a main contributor to the advancement of women role in the society in Jordan and changing cultural norms and religious interpretations that aggravate gender inequalities is a must. Key words :Women; Participation; SMEs; Empowerment; Inequalities Resume Ce travail s’adresse aux facteurs empechant la participation des femmes dans le secteur prive en Jordanie. Il estime les facteurs de base qui empeche l’habilitation des femmes et le role des Petites et Moyennes Entreprises (PME) en Jordanie, en ayant pour objectif: d’explorer le concept d’ «habilitation des femmes» et comment l’integrer dans le developpement et ses relations par rapport a la notion de parite; d’explorer les facteurs habilitant les femmes jordaniennes; de proposer d’autres facteurs ayant plus d’influence sur l’habilitation des femmes et la participation de la population active. Cet article montre certains resultats pouvant habiliter les femmes jordaniennes tels que: le pouvoir politique est le principal contributeur a l’avancement des femmes dans la societe jordanienne; il faut faire evoluer certaines normes culturelles et interpretations religieuses qui aggravent l’inegalite de genre. Mots cles : Femmes; Participation; PME; Habilitation; Inegalite
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".