MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652455330 · doi:10.1063/1.2263484

Critical Conditions for Ignition of Aluminum Particles in Cylindrical Explosive Charges

2006· article· en· W1652455330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitromethaneExplosive materialIgnition systemDetonationAluminiumMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)Particle sizeAtomic physicsComposite materialChemistryThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical conditions for the ignition of spherical aluminium particles dispersed during the detonation of long cylindrical explosive charges have been investigated experimentally. The charges consist of packed beds of aluminium particles, ranging in size from 3 – 114 μm in diameter, and saturated with sensitized liquid nitromethane (NM). The ignition conditions depend on both the charge and particle diameters with the most reactive particles corresponding to an intermediate size (∼54 μm dia). With increasing charge diameter, three particle reaction regimes are observed: i) sub‐critical (no particle reaction), ii) near‐critical (reaction at isolated spots, or radial bands or rings), and iii) super‐critical (continuous reaction of the particle cloud). To monitor the onset of aluminum oxidation, visible radiation from the charge is recorded, through a slit, with a line spectrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it