MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652505394

Королевство канада как «Артефакт»: к вопросу о начальных этапах становления канадской государственности

2012· article· ru· W1652505394 on OpenAlex
Sergey Kokotov

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВЕСТНИК Брянского государственного университета · 2012
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireRealmGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)Political scienceState formationLawHistoryEconomic historyPoliticsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Realm of Canada, its system of law and government was formatted as a result of different factors including the split of British-American Empire, formation of United States of America and evolution of British Empire itself. It wasn't a result of self-determination of Canadian nation. There were no historical, cultural, economical and social preconditions for the formation of state like in Europe. Instead of it evolution of Canadian statehood was the fundamental factor of formation of Canadian nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it