MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652571342 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.10449

35.3: Resolution Enhancement Based on Shifted Superposition

2015· article· en· W1652571342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsOntario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
KeywordsResolution (logic)Superposition principleProjection (relational algebra)ProjectorSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceHigh resolutionImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceImage resolutionComputer visionMathematicsAlgorithmRemote sensingGeologyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a resolution enhancement approach called Shifted Superposition (SSPOS) to project high‐resolution content using a low‐resolution projection system with an opto‐mechanical image shifter. Given a high‐resolution source, SSPOS learns a set of optimum spatially shifted low‐resolution (i.e., the native projector resolution) images whose superimposed projection can reproduce the high‐resolution content on the screen. Extensive evaluations using a variety of metrics demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed SSPOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it