MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652628534 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.064531

Neutron elastic and inelastic scattering investigations of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.965</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Th</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.035</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2002· article· lv· W1652628534 on OpenAlexaff
A. Hiess, R. H. Heffner, J. E. Sonier, G. H. Lander, J. L. Smith, J. C. Cooley

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInelastic neutron scatteringPhysicsAntiferromagnetismScatteringNeutronNeutron scatteringOrder (exchange)SuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsCrystallographyAtomic physicsNuclear physicsOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single crystals of the heavy-fermion superconductor ${\mathrm{UBe}}_{13}$ doped with 3.5% Th have been studied by neutron scattering techniques. This material undergoes two superconducting transitions at ${T}_{c1}\ensuremath{\cong}0.55$ and ${T}_{c2}\ensuremath{\cong}0.40\mathrm{K}.$ Using elastic neutron scattering we found no evidence for either short- or long-range magnetic order down to temperatures of 0.15 K. Similarly, exhaustive scans at reasonably high values of the momentum transfer found no evidence of a recently predicted internal lattice rearrangement of the Be nuclei at low temperatures. However, using neutron inelastic scattering we did find weak signals with a propagation direction $\mathbf{q}=〈0.5 0.5 0〉,$ indicating antiferromagnetic fluctuations that are short range in real space, and are also short lived. These correlations disappear only above about 30 K, similar to effects found in pure ${\mathrm{UBe}}_{13}.$ They also show no variation on passing through ${T}_{c}.$

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207